|
|
|
|
Articles
|
|
|
Articles |
The Alan Bates ArchiveDateline: 9th March, 1998One of the best sites devoted to actors that I have come across is the Alan Bates Archive, run by Karen Rappaport. It's packed with information about Bates' career, presented in such a way that it will interest both the Bates enthusiast and the more general theatregoer. Knowing the interest so many visitors to the British Theatre site have in our actors, I thought it would be very illuminating to interview Karen on your behalf. She agreed to do so, and here's the result! What led you to create the Alan Bates Archive in the first place? Several things came together at a propitious time. Two years ago I was an art director at a large British-American publishing house, Addison Wesley Longman. I was interested in online publishing, and was looking for a project as a personal "tutorial" so that I could explore the software -- the whole process of design for the Internet, really -- and then share it with my staff of designers. I had created a small portfolio site for my own work, nothing more. In the fall of 1996, Oliver's Travels, a 1994 BBC mini-series starring Alan Bates and Sinead Cusack, was shown in the US on PBS. I enjoyed it, and looked up Bates in the Internet Movie Database, where I found a list of his films, many of which were unfamiliar to me. But I had lived in London for several years in the early 1970s, had encountered Bates once at a party, and had seen several of his West End successes; so I knew that the IMDb was telling only part of the story, and decided to look a bit further. The picture soon emerged of a superb and greatly-respected actor who has, for his entire career, moved effortlessly from stage to film to television, producing a distinguished body of work in each medium. I also found that much of his work is by authors who are important to me, including Harold Pinter, John Osborne, David Storey, Simon Gray, D.H. Lawrence, Thomas Hardy, Chekhov, Shakespeare. The final thread was a sense of minor outrage. Bates made Oliver's Travels, which is a romantic mystery, when he was 60. Some online chat occurred that I found rude, involving hair (is it real, is it a rug, is it dyed...) and various other age-related personal comments. Even Oliver's wardrobe was dissected: could that vest be hiding a little tummy, perhaps? I thought "This man is one of our great actors; surely he deserves more respect!" And, fearing that one of those gossips (who were, of course, fans) would decide to make a website for Bates, and knowing that I could do better, the Alan Bates Archive was begun. I did some thinking about structure, drafted a biography, and wrote to Bates telling him what I had in mind, in late fall, 1996. The Archive went online in February 1997. You have obviously amassed a terrific amount of material. Where does it all come from? Do you collect it all yourself or do you have collaborators? I had nothing more than a couple of old Playbills, to begin with. By spending several months of rather intense work with the help of a research librarian, I collected reviews, a few interviews, and began to track down and enjoy the films. My academic training -- English Literature, classics minor -- included research, so it was a familiar process. Early on, I realized that the material I was collecting might well become a book; so I have been working with that in mind. As the Archive progressed, I sent a site map and drafts of pages to Mr Bates and his manager, Michael Linnit, in London. Once the Archive was online, the response from fans was gratifying. A number of people have been generous with material ranging from rare tapes of interviews and unavailable tv films to photos and reviews, personal anecdotes, ephemera, and suggestions for the little film-based photo contests that have become a monthly feature of the front page. More than one person has actually bought or upgraded a computer in order to visit the Archive! Which leads on to the question: just how much time do you have to devote to the site to keep it as up to date as it is? Basic updates take about six to eight hours, once a month. In the past year, there has always been good news to share, including a US film release, a new play going to the West End, and a recently-completed film for American television. Major redesigns do take more time, and I am always challenging myself to keep the site visually fresh and technically in a state of constant improvement. I have learned a lot about file compression and, if this were a job rather than an avocation, I would be going back through the older graphic files to improve their quality and slim them down. I'm a lot better at the technical aspects of site design than I was a year ago; the Archive continues to be a great tutorial for me, and I have recently begun to mentor a couple of newcomers to web design. What do you think is the function of a site like yours? I have seen hundreds of fan sites for one actor or another, and many seem to be the result of an obsession with the subject. Would that describe you, do you think? or do you have a different "take" on what such a site should be doing? Some of the fan sites I've looked at do seem to be a sort of love offering from an obsessed fan with a scanner. Those are the sites that tend to be incomplete, and that languish after a few months. Then there are the pages that turn intelligent actors into sex objects (I've been looking in vain for good Helen Mirren and Jamie Lee Curtis pages recently, since Bates has current projects with both women.) Others, equally unsuccessful, are commercial ventures, such as the new Laurence Olivier site, which is quite cold, and shows little understanding of his place in the history of theatre -- in its way, it seems even emptier than an inept fan page. Still others (several of the many Kenneth Branagh sites come to mind) actively probe the personal affairs of the celebrity, focus on marital status and other personal gossip. The best sites clearly have a connection, a sympathy, some sort of chemistry or bond with the subject, though it seems to me more like personal interest and affinity than obsession. As with a friendship arising from common interests, the more familiar I have become with Alan Bates's career -- not only his body of work, but also the choices he has made, his spirit and integrity -- the more I like and respect him. I think that the function of a serious site such as the Bates Archive is similar to that of a documentary film, or biography: it's homage, certainly, but it's also history, a good story, and it should reflect the character, the life and times, of its subject. It was clear to me from the beginning that Alan Bates has chosen not to share his personal life with interviewers; so the tone of the Archive is formal, and there is no information about his private life, unless it comes from him, in interviews. You say that you are now in contact with Alan Bates. How did this come about? As I mentioned earlier, I met him briefly years ago. I re-introduced myself when I began to think about the website, and last summer met with him in Richmond, Surrey, during the preview tour of his most recent play, Simon Gray's Life Support. When we met, Bates admitted to a certain ambivalence about having a web presence, undoubtedly fed by the fact that he doesn't much like reading about himself, and doesn't have access to the Internet: it's something going on behind his back, in effect. I think he understands that the Archive does not exist for him, but rather for Bates fans all over the world who have previously had nowhere to turn if they were looking for hard-to-find films or other information about his career. Recently his secretary, Rosemary Geddes, has agreed to fill in some gaps in the theatre archive, and Bates is also suggesting some alterations. I would say that we are at the beginning of what I hope will be a long and amiable association. How important is the design of the site? Obviously ease of navigation is important (although some site authors don't seem to share this view!), but what about the "look"? Ah, my soapbox, please! As a designer, I think that good visual and structural design is essential to every web page! As with our own physical appearance, there's the matter of the essential "self" of a site; its character, its structure. The site's appearance -- its clothing -- is another matter, and can be changed without altering the essence of the site. In fact, a bit of variety is important. Here I admit to an advantage: I have years of experience designing books of all sorts, so I know how to navigate successfully through visual information on paper, and have found it easy to adapt this experience to site design, though books are linear, and web design is not. Like good architecture, I believe that a website should give the visitor some hints about where to go, but also allow the freedom to move about easily, to explore without getting lost. The greatest design is of no use if it's too cumbersome; the best-planned site becomes boring quickly if it never changes. I am quite impatient and simply leave sites that take too long to appear. And, frankly, I no longer design for the low-end user who connects with less than 28.8 modem speed, or has a tiny monitor. A site like the Bates Archive will always be graphics-heavy, since one wants to include lots of photos. But I keep them small, or link from thumbnails to larger photos, or use slide shows (animated gifs) for variety. On the other hand, I feel that visitors to a specialized site such as this will be patient and tolerate a brief wait as, for instance, the little photos on the film page appear: it's great fun to see all those characters -- over 30 years' worth -- side by side; I've had no complaints about the speed. (If the site were selling a product, such a page would be far too long and too slow.) Beyond that, I have tried to design with sympathy for Alan Bates's own style: he has great flair, favors waist coats, scarves, turns up his collars. It's throwaway, casual, understated elegance -- he seems completely at ease with himself, a warm and attractive man. So I have given much thought to the typography that runs throughout the pages, keeping it strong, simple, understated, but with flourishes of a friendly cursive font. I depend upon soft shadows, the occasional black background, for variety and emphasis, but good photographs of Bates are the most important visual element of the site. The only section with a background pattern is the page with items from the collection of a long-time Bates fan. It's a feature, and I've given it a unique look. You can see the first-generation Bates Archive front page on my own portfolio site, it's fussier than the present design. I like it quite well, but prefer the present simplicity, and also came to feel that the previous typography really didn't reflect the subject. I'm sure that there will be further evolution: the "wrapper" I've just added is an innovation with a purpose. As you're reading the quote from a review, graphics for the next page are loading. Now there's little or no wait on that page before the little photo slide-show begins to play. It's a simple but great trick. I don't use graphics to link to other pages, or the logos for awards and associations that are so readily available. The Bates Archive is a noncommercial site; its links are functional, meant to enrich its usefulness for visitors, not to advertise other websites. I have also begun to do a regular check to see who is linking to the Bates Archive, and have already found a handful of what is rather grossly called "cyber-gutters:" other websites which create an uncredited link to an internal Bates Archive page, thus implying that the page is part of the other site (our film reviews and spotlights, with their screen captures, seem particularly popular). There are so many amateurs running fan websites that most of this unauthorized borrowing is probably innocent; but it's still undesirable, and I firmly discourage it. I have also placed a link back to the Bates Archive on every page. Have any particular sites influenced you, in any way? As a designer, my aim is always to create something fresh. But also, as a designer, everything I see influences me. To my daughter's amusement, even when we are stalled in traffic I am commenting on the typefaces (not to mention the letter spacing) used on the vehicle in front of us. In terms of general design, I have been influenced by these excellent sites:
I knew the instant I saw the Mining Company site that it was well thought out and professional, and, Peter, you give the British Theatre section a pleasing and personal face and voice. It was a brilliant move on the part of the Mining Company to provide site guides! I bookmarked you immediately and soon felt comfortable emailing a comment about something in your newsletter. I hope that the Bates Archive has the same approachable character. I think it does -- I get a considerable amount of mail, and so does Mr Bates. Is there anything you would like to add, either about the ABA, or about theatre websites in general? There's the huge topic of copyright, far too much to discuss in any depth. But, like most such sites, the Bates Archive contains copyright protected material. I do request permission to post reviews, interviews, etc., and it is often given. But sometimes there is simply no response. Further, since Bates reviews go back decades, it is not within my means to trace the copyright for publications that no longer exist. I have made a decision that I am comfortable with in terms of ethics, but that (as the wife of a lawyer) I know is not legally sound: I go ahead and put the article or photo online with as complete a credit as possible. My rationale is that visitors to the Archive are much like visitors to a library. Nothing is being sold; the only purpose of the material is education, appreciation. Nothing is gained by omitting material where the copyright is obscure; much is gained by including it. If a book emerges out of the contents of the Archive, the necessary permissions will, of course, be obtained. In this regard, I'd like to add one more notable website: that of The
Times (London). Its design, like that of the newspaper itself,
is functional and classic. In its generosity, it is a model of what
a great daily newspaper can offer the Internet. I depend on the Times
and the Telegraph for news and an important personal link
to London (I read the Times over my morning coffee, not
the When you "surf" (God! I hate that word!), what are you looking for? What attracts you? What turns you off? I don't surf all that much any more, though I do explore links from sites that interest me. I read reviews in all sorts of publications and check sites when I have spare time. Among the proliferation of theatre sites, I gravitate to those with frequent news updates, previews of upcoming productions, and early cast announcements. I use the Net to shop for books, computer, camera and video equipment. I'm always looking online for Bates-related Playbills and film pressbooks. I'm drawn to commercial sites that have good search tools and are without complex graphics that slow the site. The most annoying page I've visited in some time is the enormous CBS site. It is well-designed and quite easy to navigate, but there seems to be no way to reach CBS from the website. That, to me, is a violation of the spirit of the Internet, which is at heart, two-way communication. If the Times can provide easy access, so can CBS! Peter, thanks for this opportunity to talk with you about things that are important to me. The single best thing about the Net is the ability it gives us to connect with colleagues and kindred spirits that we would never otherwise know. Amen to that! Articles Indices: |
|
|