|
Articles
|
|
|
Articles |
Changes at the RSCDateline: 10th June, 2001 When a major national company announces far-reaching changes in the way in which it works, there is bound to be concern, even worry, not only within the company itself but also within the whole theatre world. Predictably the unions, Equity and BECTU, have protested. Equity has shown great hostility and BECTU has called upon Ken Livingston, the Mayor of London, to oppose the plans to leave the Barbican. Not long after the proposals were announced, I received this from a correspondent: They sacked all the wardrobe staff in Stratford last week, then had to re-employ them the next day when they realised Alice would need a lot of skilled workers for the costumes! It was a really crass way of telling people their contracts would end at the end of this season and the Stratford end of the operation is sunk in anger, gloom and depression! The actors rehearsing Jubilee are just sitting around giggling at the director - Greg Doran - one of the biggest supporters of the scheme - it's that or cry! They too are angry - and insulted by this move. On the other hand, according to director Michael Boyd, the RSC "feels like a cultural sausage factory, admittedly producing good sausages" and is in danger of slipping into "dull irrelevance" if changes are not made. "Without putting a little Semtex under an organisation like this you go nowhere." he went on. "Subtle use of Semtex is not a bad thing." Adrian Noble claims that, in general, actors are in favour of the changes. "We've also consulted 40 actors about the new structure," he said, "ranging from those leaving drama school to ones who have always turned us down. Ninety per cent were in favour of a contract of six months or less. There was a tidal wave in support of change. "The changes we plan - a new deal for actors and a bold reinterpretation of what it is to be a national theatre company - are focused on the next generation of theatregoers." The Implications Articles Indices: |
|
|