British Theatre Guide logo
 
Articles

 

Links

Articles

News

Reviews

Amateur Theatre

Contact

Other Resources

 

The Royal Court Theatre Inside Out

By Ruth Little and Emily McLaughlin
Oberon Books £20
479 pages

Dateline: 17th December, 2007

It is fitting that there is more than one book to celebrate the immense achievements of the English Stage Company at the Royal Court during its first 50 years. This volume, which has some of the characteristics of a colourful brick, at least in weight and shape, complements Harriet Devine's Looking Back with a very different intent and style.

The overarching structure is entirely chronological, primarily divided up by artistic directors and then significant plays from the Court's history.

Starting with the period before George Devine opened the theatre, it features extracts from interviews and detailed research in an effort to give an overall picture of this historic institution. At times, the research is a little too academic for what has always been a lively venue, the footnotes giving numerous sources eventually almost equalling the number of pages, 479.

The authors have enlisted the help of so many people who have been intimately involved with the life of the Royal Court. This includes writers, directors, designers and even front of house staff, which is a fitting tribute to the all-round efforts of the staff of the theatre that has often been run almost as a collective with a stronger team ethos than almost any other London artistic or business organisation.

Over the years, politics have been at least as important as plays on so many occasions, frequently because of lack of funds but also as a result of the nature of a theatre that is naturally left wing in inclination but is also oppositional, often internally as much as externally, thanks to a series of strong characters only too happy to challenge any given.

Over the years, debate has raged over the validity of Look Back in Anger, Saved, Blasted and in a very different way, Rock 'n' Roll, which many suggested should not have been included in the Jubilee celebrations as neither Sir Trevor Nunn or Sir Tom Stoppard had a track record at the theatre.

In addition to the linear history, 100 or more plays are analysed to varying degrees using commentary from the authors, directors and assorted others involved with productions building a picture that comprehensively covers the commissioning, development and writing of many works and gives at least a feel for the text.

The concentration is though very much on the underlying ideas and thought processes rather than the detailed plotting or staging. It might also have been helpful to have more references to the actors who performed in the plays and the way in which they did so.

This element presents a good overall picture of the development of the theatre from the very earliest days of Angus Wilson's The Mulberry Bush and soon afterwards Look Back in Anger, to the plays that completed the Jubilee celebrations, Ian Rickson's unforgettable revivals of Krapp's Last Tape impeccably delivered by Harold Pinter in the Upstairs space and The Seagull, Downstairs with Kristin Scott Thomas, Chiwetel Ejiofor and Mackenzie Crook.

Interspersed with these are short essays on pink pages about numerous topics such as Stage and Design, the Young Writers Programme, Casting, Script Meetings and international outreach and importation.

In some ways, The Royal Court Theatre Inside Out is at its best in revealing the characters of those artistic directors from George Devine and William Gaskill through the now largely forgotten eras of directors such as Oscar Lewenstein, Robert Kidd (with Nicholas Wright) and Stuart Burge to the long servers, Max Stafford Clark, Stephen Daldry and Ian Rickson who at fourteen, five and eight years respectively outlasted every previous incumbent bar Devine himself who managed eleven years prior to his untimely death.

Helpfully, there is also a list of every play performed at the Court, including those during its refurbishment exile in the late 1990s. So many have been controversial, which is part of the charm of the place.

In addition, there are large numbers of high-quality black and white photographs and reproductions of documents that vary from reports of earrings falling off during performances to pages from the scheduling books kept by different artistic directors.

This is an enjoyable and very detailed homage to a writers' theatre that still gives pleasure to so many. It will be read with enjoyment by anyone who has spent significant time on the theatre's now comfortable seats and wants to know more about the tradition that has seeped into the building and can be felt on every single visit to Sloane Square.

Philip Fisher

Articles from 2007
Articles from 2006
Articles from 2005
Articles from 2004
Articles from 2003
Articles from 2002
Articles from 2001
Articles from 2000
Articles from 1999
Articles from 1998
Articles from 1997

 

 

©Peter Lathan 2007