British Theatre Guide logo
 
News

 

Links

Articles

News

Reviews

Amateur Theatre

Contact

Other Resources

Bookstore

Forum

Search the Site

 

Dateline: 2nd April, 2004

Richard Eyre Wins Theatre Book Prize

At a reception at the Theatre Museum in Covent Garden today authors, actors, directors, designers, publishers, press and academics gathered for the announcement of the winner of the Theatre Book Prize, presented annually by the Society for Theatre Research to the book an independent panel of judges considers the best book published in English during the year on British theatre, its history and practice.

The judges: actor Corin Redgrave, theatre critic Susannah Clapp and Jane Pritchard, theatre historian and archivist for ENB and Rambert, talked about the five titles on their short list before the announcement of the winner by actor Timothy West, President of the Society for Theatre Research who then made the presentation.

Winner Sir Richard Eyre is known internationally for his work as a director and for his work in film and television as well as theatre. He was formerly Director of the Royal National Theatre and his winning book, National Service, covers the years when he held that post.

The other short listed authors include two actors (Oliver Ford Davies and Michael Pennington) a theatre photographer (John Haynes) and two academics (John Knowlson and David Wiles).

Before the announcement of the winner of the Theatre Book Prize for 2003 the judges spoke about the titles on the short-list. Susannah Clapp (Theatre Critic of the Observer) had this to say about Richard Eyre's National Service, his diary of ten years at the National Theatre.

'This is my ideal theatre book, which is actually to say it's an ideal book. In a sense the interest of this book is quite straightforward: it is a close-up, first-hand, insider's account of ten years in one of the most important, and some would say the most important theatre in Britain. All the things that make this book significant could also make it ponderous. The sheer weight of material could make it difficult to get through, but this is so much not the case here. The first thing that makes me want to advocate this books is that it does everything that you'd want a book written by an artistic director to do. Anyone who goes to the theatre can't fail to be interested in an account of a production mounting, taking-off, or, particularly in this book, waning, failing, and the moment when you know it's not going to work. There are really miserable moments when that is the case here - and soaring moments when that isn't the case.

'It's got a mixture of the consequential and the apparently insignificant and trivial. It's got the surprise encounter with a young fellow called Tony Blair who is like a very agreeable academic until he smiles and looks like a politician. A moment when John Osborne looks like an Edwardian and Princess Margaret looking like a Maltese landlady and complaining that she hated opera because it was a lot of people standing there yelling.

'Although it's a diary account, a journalistic account in some senses, it's also very subtly written. And a book which should put every theatre critic on her guard. Because it is consistently demanding about the theatre. It is very trenchantly written and it takes for granted that it matters, which means that you can be very hard on what you see: and Richard Eyre is famously hardest on his own productions. He has very lightly acerbic things to say about theatre as spectacle. There are very finely balanced judgements... where you feel both his enthusiasm for an occasion and also an ultimate recoil to something not being delivered, not finally being said.

'I think the most important thing about this book is that it makes a case for theatre not by polemic, but simply by the sheer volume of life that it includes. It is one of the best accounts of depression that I have ever read, and extraordinarily so because hers is someone who has a fulfilled and very successful professional and personal life and yet is being dogged by melancholia. It's a very tender account of being a father - almost any daughter reading this book would have wanted this person as their dad - and a woebegone, wry account of being a son. In discussing all these aspects it brings to them all the qualities which make a good production and which make Richard Eyre a good director and a good runner of a theatre: which is to say he's got a quick eye and a very receptive ear.

'This book shows a really vital interconnection between the stage and life. It doesn't co-opt the life onto the stage it shows them both informing each other.'

|A|B|C|D|E|F|G|H|I|J|K|L|M|N|O|P|Q|R|S|T|U|V|W|X|Y|Z|

News Archive A-L
News Archive M-Z
Production News Archive

Please note that all three Archive indices are very long and will therefore take some time to download.

 

 

©Peter Lathan 2004