British Theatre Guide reviews  
Toolshack.com
Web tools and webmaster resources, including: traffic stats, site monitoring, banner exchange, search engine submission, more...
 
Reviews

 

Links

Articles

News

Reviews

Contact

Other Resources

 

Love's Labour's Lost publicity image

Love's Labour's Lost

By William Shakespeare
York Shakespeare Project
Friargate Theatre, York

Review by Peter Lathan (2004)

It is hard to believe it is a year ago that I sat in the Fiargate Theatre and watched an hilarious Comedy of Errors from the York Shakespeare Project, but, indeed, a year has passed and now we have the fifth of the series, Love's Labour's Lost, a very different kind of comedy to director Chris Rawson's last production. In between, of course, we've had Titus Andronicus - not exactly a barrel of laughs!

In Rawson's production we start at the end, with the Spring and Winter songs, divorced from their context and sung, not by the rsitcs, but by a mixed group.. Beautiful a capella singing, definitely, but why put them at the beginning? The effect is to create a rather odd ending: the King and Berowne are alone on the stage as the latter says, "That's too long for a play" - end of play. Very modern, but also very un-Shakespearean. There are good reasons for ending with the rustics, unsophisticated but undoubtedly more down-to-earth than the King and his companions.

Love's Labour's Lost is a play about, among other things, language, and it plays with words and their meanings at a very basic level (in the "low" sub-plot) as well as intellectually and wittily in the "high" style of the courtiers. Words can be used to deceive, not just others but one's own self, and this kind of multi-faceted deception is another theme which runs through the play. To carry it off requires a lightness of touch, a kind of playfulness in the speaking, and an agile vocal dynamic which most amateur actors cannot achieve, through a lack, not of ability, but of training.

Those who came closest to it were Paul Toy (the King) who, as a Webber Douglas graduate, does have the training, Beverley Chapman (the Princess) and, in particular, Gillian Bayes, whose Moth was a constant delight. But on the whole, the speaking, although generally admirably clear, was too much on one level, with, however, more lightness and brightness in the second half.

It is a very difficult play, a very wordy play (in the sense that the words are the action), and one which is for that reason, very difficult for modern audiences - and modern actors!

The YSP's next production will be Romeo and Juliet, to be played in the open air next July. Hopefully it will attract better audiences.

 

 

©Peter Lathan 2004